On March 10, 2025, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. instructed the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA” or “the Agency”) to evaluate the food industry’s continued use of the Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) self-affirmation process (or “self-affirming”) to substantiate the safety of new ingredients. FDA proposes rulemaking to prevent industry from continuing to self-affirm that new ingredients are GRAS viewing the practice as a loophole in some cases that has allowed new ingredients to be used in foods without sufficient safety data and a known safety profile.
If implemented, such a change would significantly impact both the food and feed industries marking a dramatic shift in how new ingredients are evaluated. Not only would the Agency now require companies to notify it and potentially pursue FDA premarket approval, eliminating the self-affirming option would most definitely increase the total amount of safety data required to show GRAS while also increasing the cost of going to market. The proposed reversal would prevent industry from continuing to make its own independent assessments of GRAS and instead put the decision in the hands of the Agency.
GRAS self-affirmation allows manufacturers to introduce new food additives to the market without FDA notice or premarket review and approval by simply self-affirming that a new substance is safe for its intended use. In practice the process involves the creation and maintaining of an internal safety file that traditionally includes safety studies, published literature and expert panel reports. Discretion is afforded to industry to determine what constitutes sufficient safety data to support a new ingredient’s safety. Such files need not be submitted to FDA for premarket approval although FDA encourages industry to notify it of all such ingredient self-affirmations. The FDA keeps track of these notices on a public inventory, which allows industry to track new substances and relevant safety data.
In addition to reducing regulatory oversight, GRAS self-affirmation provides efficiency and certainty in marketing new products. Industry rather than FDA controls a new ingredient’s fate.
FDA is now reconsidering this much relied upon option. If the GRAS self-affirmation option is revoked, industry will presumably be required to notify FDA of new ingredients and accompanying safety data; provide notification and most likely undergo premarket review prior to introduction into the market. While this would provide enhanced transparency in food products generally, eliminating the GRAS self-affirmation process will increase the burden on industry to establish safety and also substantially delay the introduction of new ingredients into the market by several years.
Michael Best has a team of experienced food and feed lawyers and lobbyists that are ready to answer your questions about the proposed change and assist you in being involved in the rulemaking process.
Related People

Preview Attorney's BiographyFor more than 30 years, Paul has specialized in product liability defense, class action defense, multi-district litigation (MDL) defense, and other complex commercial litigation. He is particularly well known for his work in the class action and food and beverage sectors, where he is a nationally and locally recognized speaker and thought leader on product liability issues and regulatory trends.

Preview Attorney's BiographyDavid’s practice sits squarely at the intersection of the food-water-energy nexus. His work in the areas of environmental, regulatory, agricultural production, manufacturing and distribution, and renewable energy projects gives him the depth of experience necessary to counsel clients who will be feeding and powering a projected global population of nine billion people by 2050—at a time when resource scarcity and consumer confidence require an ongoing commitment to stewardship and sustainability.

Preview Attorney's BiographyAllison assists clients with a variety of complex regulatory issues. She also counsels clients on other related business matters.Prior to joining Michael Best in her current role, Allison gained experience as a Summer Associate with the firm. Earlier, she was a law clerk at a boutique law firm in Milwaukee where she established corporations for clients and filed documents with the Department of Financial Institutions, drafted client communications and motions for the court, analyzed and made rec ...

Preview Attorney's BiographyLeah takes a big-picture approach in advising clients as they face challenges on environmental, food safety and regulatory compliance issues. She draws on experience gained in cases involving the EPA, FDA and other public agencies. Leah’s success as a counselor, litigator and negotiator reflects her combination of subject matter expertise, industry knowledge and creativity.