Litigation

Overview

To prevail in litigation, clients need exceptional representation both inside and outside the courtroom.

With more than 50 lawyers and other professionals, our seasoned Litigation practice group provides battle-tested service and representation for nearly any type of dispute.

The Lawyers

Our litigation lawyers are, first and foremost, courtroom advocates. When circumstances demand, our first chairs, including former federal prosecutors and others with significant jury and court trial experiences, take cases to trial and win. At the same time, we focus on all aspects of pre-trial procedure and discovery. Our litigators also serve clients outside the courtroom, achieving successful results through arbitrations, mediations, and all forms of alternative dispute resolution.

We carefully consider each case’s staffing based on the substantive issues and business considerations present in each case. Teams within our litigation group focus their practices in specific areas, enabling them to build deep knowledge of the industry and legal issues. Our litigation teams can also turn to more than 350 other lawyers and professionals at Michael Best for substantive support and insight.

Service Areas

Class Action, Collective Action & Multidistrict Litigation

Commercial Litigation

Construction Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Creditors’ Rights, Bankruptcy, Reorganization & Workouts

Employment Litigation

Environmental Enforcement Defense & Litigation

Government Investigations & White Collar Defense

Insurance Litigation

Intellectual Property Enforcement, Clearance & Defense

Land Use Litigation

Privacy & Cybersecurity Litigation

Products Liability Defense

Tax Controversy & Litigation

 

Representative Matters

Michael Best’s litigation clients range from nationally known corporations to smaller businesses, nonprofits, and other organizations nationwide. Regardless of size, we share their commitment to protect and pursue their rights. Our litigators have experience with a wide variety of litigation types and claims, including:

  • Agribusiness, food, and beverage
  • Antitrust and trade regulation
  • Business torts, fraud, defamation, false advertising, and unfair competition
  • Class action, multidistrict, qui tam, and other complex litigation
  • Construction
  • Consumer fraud
  • Contract and Uniform Commercial Code
  • Corporate litigation involving proxy statements, mergers and acquisitions, derivative actions, securities, and RICO claims
  • Dealership
  • Electronic Funds Transfer Act
  • Employment and agency claims, covenants not to compete, wrongful discharge, discrimination, and civil rights
  • Environmental, including insurance, toxic torts, natural resource damages claims, and state and federal regulatory issues
  • ERISA, including health and welfare benefit denials, pension, benefit calculation, and breach of fiduciary duty
  • Fair and Accurate Credit and Transactions Act (FACTA)
  • Financial and commercial disputes involving sales, secured transactions, negotiable instruments, letters of credit, collections, replevins, lender liability, and fraud
  • Health and medical care
  • Insurance coverage, including bad faith claims
  • Intellectual property, including patents, trademarks, copyright, and trade secrets
  • Products and tort liability
  • Real estate litigation involving zoning, land use, nuisance, transactional, and financing issues
  • Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
  • Unauthorized practice of law
  • White-collar crime and government investigations

We also counsel clients on in-house and outside training, tailored to the client's particular needs. Such training can be helpful during pending litigation and as a preventive measure during periods of relative calm.

Experience

  • Represent a global developer and manufacturer of chemicals and materials in personal injury litigation surrounding white lead carbonate pigments that were used in residential paints prior to a ban in the 1970s. Plaintiffs in Wisconsin sued the historic manufacturers of such pigments, and in 2005 the Wisconsin Supreme Court adopted an unprecedented “risk contribution” theory of liability that allows the suits even if plaintiffs cannot identify the manufacturers of the specific pigments they were exposed to. More than 170 cases were filed in federal court in the Eastern District of Wisconsin and state court in Milwaukee County against our client and others—the only cases of their kind in the country.
  • Represent a major manufacturer of iron castings in a precedent-setting “hybrid” collective/class action involving claims under the FLSA and state law. The plaintiffs are foundry workers who contend they should be compensated for time spent donning and doffing work gear, showering, and walking because it is a necessary part of their workday. We won summary judgment before the district court, which found that the activities were not required to be performed on-site at the foundries and thus were not compensable. The Seventh Circuit reversed on appeal. The U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari, and the case went back to the district court, which certified both classes. We sought an immediate appeal from the Seventh Circuit, and the parties are currently briefing certification issues on appeal. This is a unique case, as the outcome hinges on the safety of the work environment.
  • Serve as lead counsel to a global manufacturer of colors, flavors, and fragrances in toxic tort liability litigation related to the chemicals diacetyl and 2,3 pentanedione. In recent years, more than 100 lawsuits alleging respiratory injury have been brought against flavoring companies and others involved in the production of food and beverage products that use these chemicals. We represent our client in two pending cases involving three claimants in two jurisdictions (Illinois and Iowa). These cases are groundbreaking because flavoring chemicals have never previously been the target of products liability/personal injury claims.

Insights

back to top