Enforcement, Clearance & Defense

Overview

Michael Best’s Intellectual Property Litigation team works with clients to craft comprehensive strategies to enforce their own intellectual property rights and defend against intellectual property claims asserted by third parties.

As part of our firm’s largest practice group, our IP litigation Team has extraordinary experience in all aspects of acquiring and protecting IP rights. We combine practical experience with technical expertise, enabling our trial lawyers to simplify even the most complicated technologies and business and legal issues for judges and juries.

This experience and expertise create an understanding that allows our professionals to strike to the heart of any intellectual property dispute in an expeditious and cost-effective manner. We are trusted advisors on enforcement and clearance matters for clients ranging from individual inventors and startup companies to major universities and large multinational corporations across a wide range of industries.

Our primary goal in every enforcement and clearance matter is to help our clients achieve their business goals without litigation whenever possible, through proactive measures. We offer training in best practices, monitor legal developments and anticipate their potential impact on our client’s business, conduct audits and searches to identify opportunities and mitigate risk, monitor the products and IP rights of competitors, and advise clients early in the development cycle to reduce litigation risk. In sum, we consider ourselves partners with our clients to help them conduct their business to maximize the value of their IP rights, which are necessarily diminished by avoidable disputes with others.

When litigation is necessary, we look at our client’s overall business objectives and manage the litigation in a manner aligned with our clients’ overall IP strategy. We represent clients in patent, trademark, trade dress, copyright, trade secret, Internet, and false advertising cases in federal and appellate courts in almost every circuit in the country, and before agencies such as the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) and its appeal boards (the PTAB and TTAB). When our client’s interests warrant, we aggressively try cases and bring with us the advantage of technical resources that permit us to present the underlying technology and our clients’ position more effectively.

Service Areas

Patent Litigation

Trademark and Copyright Litigation

Experience

  • Served as counsel for leading manufacturer of electrical and electronic products in a patent infringement and unfair competition action related to an important product line of enclosures for underground utilities. Secured a favorable claim construction ruling on key claim terms early in the matter and the case was successfully settled for the client thereafter.
  • Served as counsel for some of the titans of the radio broadcasting industry in a suit relating to digital music radio broadcasting in multiple jurisdictions. Successfully secured a stay of litigation pending the outcome of reexamination proceedings that resulted in substantial amendments to the patents.
  • Represented a Petitioner before both the PTAB and Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in invalidating all of the claims of a competitor’s patent in an IPR proceeding. The representation was notable for three reasons: 1) The Federal Circuit decision is frequently cited as one of the first decisions in which the Federal Circuit applied the Supreme Court decision in In re Cuozzo; 2) It is the first case in which the PTAB  reversed itself on remand in favor of a Petitioner to find claims invalid; 3) The PTAB ruled in its institution decision that the doctrine of assignor estoppel does not apply in IPR proceedings. The USPTO designated the PTAB’s decision in this regard as Precedential. It is only the ninth IPR decision to be so designated. The decision becoming Precedential confirms that the PTAB will permit an assignor who otherwise could not challenge the validity of a patent in a proceeding in the district court to do so before the PTAB.

Primary Contact

Primary Contact

back to top